You can still wear eye protection during the safety test...

I don't think we need to have real human risk to get results from the experiment.

And, as we all know, humans can't be scammers. They need the robots to lie.

If it wasn't marketing it wouldn't have fancy branding... It wouldn't even be announced.

I'm sure we'll start to get 'authentic' bad grammar LLMs that actually mussy up your grammar for that natural feeling.

You can do that now. Just ask it to use bad grammar and introduce spelling mistakes and it does.

Yeah I'm not sure how that's currently working out. https://proofofcorn.com/

Are you saying that has failed? It isn't obvious to me from that page that anything in particular is going wrong. I don't think anyone is daft enough to claim that AI solves the "Iowa remains unplantable due to winter conditions" problem.

Looking at the timeline they seem hopelessly behind. Its currently the planting window and they don't have land or a person to work it.

Ah, thank you. It's not the planting window yet where I am, north of Iowa, so I wasn't certain where they were.

logs suggest it's been 'critically failing' and 'blocked for 68 days' on farmhand introduction, although the logs don't go back far enough (and cut off too early) to really tell what's going on. https://proofofcorn.com/log

That's kind of the opposite problem -- the agent doesn't have robot arms or legs or a parcel of land. It has to rely on people to get access to land and plant and harvest the corn, and those people are ignoring it.

A magic 8-ball "can process the myriad of internal states" of any questions you throw at it. But we don't use it even tho it can give us answers.

How else would you whip the llama's ass?

You summon Wesley Willis of course (rip).

Kinda feels like identifying the key user stories with a bit too much naval gazing at the implementation.

That said, the implementations start to gain their own weight as user expectation grows to meet the implementation. I suppose the noun thinking is not entirely frivolous for an established app with expected core workflows and design language.

That's strange. For me the persuasive essay with clear thesis and supporting evidence was the major format that was pushed.

My experience as well and this was at public school. I really thought that was the only way to write a good essay.

Ironically they leave out a real comparison to television shows, or episodic content like comic books. Are these forms of media broken if you don't watch every episode of every season of a show? Doubtful.