The original title is:

> The Trump Admin’s Own Investigators Found No EU Internet Censorship. So They Ignored The Findings.

> It would be a very different Internet if people took responsibility for their own content.

Pedantically, people would take physical responsibility for the process of hosting their own content and substantially more moral responsibility for their own content. People already take legal responsibility for their own illegal content. What Section 230 does is minimize the risk of having to take legal responsibility (and/or de facto financial responsibility) for someone else's content, with exceptions regarding federal crimes, sex trafficking in both civil and criminal contexts, and intellectual property.

The full title is:

> What Does a Hologram Trademark Signify When the Hologram Isn’t There?–Upper Deck v. Pixels

Here [1] is more detail about EFF's stance regarding AI training and fair use. (I found it by searching for site:eff.org ai training fair use .)

[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/05/us-copyright-offices-d...

The full title is:

> New “vibe coded” AI translation tool splits the video game preservation community

The original title is:

> DOGE Goes Nuclear: How Trump Invited Silicon Valley Into America’s Nuclear Power Regulator

The original title is:

> Federal Cyber Experts Thought Microsoft’s Cloud Was “a Pile of Shit.” They Approved It Anyway.

The original title is:

> Oil Regulators Found Hundreds of Wells Violating Oklahoma Rules. Then They Ignored Their Findings.

The original title is:

> Blocking the Internet Archive Won’t Stop AI, But It Will Erase the Web’s Historical Record

The original title is:

> The IRS’s Verification System for Sharing Taxpayer Data With ICE Would Have Accepted ‘Don’t Care 12345’ as a Valid Address