It's a big study about a very hot topic affecting real lives of people in every profession. Anti-trans or pro-trans, I believe it's important medical information for people to be as informed as possible for themselves and others.
Do you not think that that would have a negative impact on the world? or do you not care, or is this "the world is going to hell so I may as well get mine"?
Um, yes. If I were certain of a price movement before others, I'd take advantage, and so would you. But you can virtue signal with fake empathy if you'd like.
As long as the hordes of losers are not bothered by it enough to ask for fairness in the business, you’re right. Ethics and morals are constructs with the intention of creating a better, more just common existence. If the people in this common existence don’t care, then there is no reason for them not to do it.
> Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) cost ~$4,406 to run the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, ~11% less than Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, ~$4,970) despite scoring 4 points higher. This is driven by lower output token usage, even after accounting for Opus 4.7's new tokenizer. This metric does not account for cached input token discounts, which we will be incorporating into our cost calculations in the near future.
Do you still see Mythos as being so groundbreaking in cyber security now that it's widely reported previous and other models found the same vulnerabilities?
Yes, you're missing the forest for the trees. The impressive thing about Mythos is that it develops working exploits end to end without human guidance. Even Anthropic admitted 4.6 found most of the vulns. Finding a vuln is not that impressive, finding a working chain is the hard part.
OpenAI had been very strict about blocking reverse engineering/Ghidra/IDA_Pro-MCP tasks. I even got a warning email. I was having much more success convincing Claude Code for those tasks without warnings. Seems like they've tightened things up.
I switched to Codex. What I noticed is that while Claude was a more elegant coder and more accurate in how it went about coding, Codex is more intelligent... hard to describe it. If I could have a subscription to both, I'd use Opus to plan and code, and then check the work and fix issues with Codex.
reply