Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hcurtiss's commentslogin

Is it possible that can be attributed to lagging effects of their predecessors’ policies?


The consecutive GOP events don't seem to point to that.


Why not? Has Musk shut off Starlink? The reporting out of Ukraine was almost entirely wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_in_the_Russian-Ukrain...


From your link, with good sources:

In 2022, Elon Musk denied a Ukrainian request to extend Starlink's coverage up to Russian-occupied Crimea during a counterattack on a Crimean port, from which Russia had been launching attacks against Ukrainian civilians; doing so would have violated US sanctions on Russia.[18] This event was widely reported in 2023, erroneously characterizing it as Musk "turning off" Starlink coverage in Crimea.[19][20] SpaceX executives repeatedly stated that Starlink needed to remain a civilian network;[21][22][12] in late 2022, as Starlink was being used as a tool in combat in Ukraine, SpaceX announced Starshield, a Starlink-like program designed for government customers.[23][21] Musk is reported to have said that Ukraine was "going too far" in threatening to inflict a “strategic defeat” on the Kremlin.[24]

Musk, like Trump, has an interesting relationship with Russia. The investigations into that have been quashed, so we don’t get to find out about the rumoured Kremlin calls he was making.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/business/dealbook/musk-pu...


The allegation at the time was that he turned off Starlink. That was not true. He did not turn it on at Ukraine’s request because US law prohibited it.


The current administration quashed the investigation into the contact he was having with Putin.

So I guess we get to stick with your story.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy0l3wl76gzo


> doing so would have violated US sanctions on Russia.

that made me laugh!


Nobody brought up Ukraine


Who is “they”? Maduro is not the elected leader of Venezuela.


How did you come to that conclusion?


Western logic.


Literally nobody believes he won the last election. Biden said this repeatedly.


Neither is your Trump the elected leader of Venezuela.


Yeah, the difference is the Powerboost hybrid electric motor is only like 50 hp. I want 350 hp of electric motor that can be powered by either the battery or an onboard ICE.


I’m actually pretty stoked about this pivot. All the advantages of an EV with gas and go optionality. Will be an awesome pickup.


I saw that too. If that’s their plan, I’m pretty bullish on Ford. All the advantages of an EV with a range extender. Like the Chevy Volt version of the F-150. I’d be all over that.


Isn’t it well known that they’ve lost money for every Lightning they’ve sold? Whereas the ICE F-150 is one of their most profitable sales?


Same. In a Powerboost, pulling my 5000 pound boat 500 miles to north Idaho is super easy, with a single refuel. In a Lightning that would be a nightmare, recharging 4-5 times. In truth, I’m excited about Ford’s pivot. I think electric motors with a range extender would be fantastic. Like the Chevy Volt for pickups.


I agree too, a range extender is needed for the infrequent long trip.


That’s a pretty fuzzy number. How do they value or even allocate the value of those free services?


Where do you get this impression? I don’t know anybody who thinks that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: