Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more hashstring's commentslogin

That’s just a wrapper around quarks for the most part…


I personally identify as a quark-gluon plasma held together by the strong force and a sheer lack a boundaries.


Apple approaches it different with iCloud. You have a clear option to not hand these keys over.

It shows that your idea of how the market works clearly is not representative of the actual market.


You realize the famous case of Apple pushing back against the govt ended because their encryption was breakable by a third party, right?


There are some errors in what you write, and despite that, it is not clear to me what the supposed ‘realization’ would be.

1. The famous 2016 San Bernardino case predates Advanced Data Protection technology of iCloud backups. It was never about encryption keys, it was about signing a ‘bad’ iOS update.

2. Details are limited, but it involved a third-party exploit to gain access to the device, not to break the encryption (directly). These are different things and should both be addressed for security, but separately.

Evidently, after this case ended, Apple continued its efforts. It rolled out protecting backups from Apple, and the requirement of successful user authentication before installing iOS updates (which is also protecting against Apple or stolen signing keys).

There is a market here.


As strong as ever…

The US has a strong military but its dominance position is declining rapidly. It’s going around threatening the whole world.

It’s failing to effectively address their problem with China and Russia.

Domestically, 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, you have ICE running around and Medicaid being slashed to afford that.

All the leaves are brown…


Thanks to the kleptrocrats and oligarchs… sold ya sold ya sold ya.


Honey, wake up, we’re living in the finance capitalism era. Also in this part of history, the majority of the goods you consume are NOT produced by your overlords. The goods are produced by labour. Not by speculation or by private ownership of the means of production.


Starting a comment with honey does not prime the reader for polite conversation. Mind the HN guidelines.


It’s a pretty common meme template. It shouldn’t prime a reader for impolite conversation, especially given the HN guidelines.


It comes across as patronising; as if you think they're a sweet naive airhead that needs informing.


That’s your interpretation. There’s a non-zero chance that I do not think that they are a sweet naive airhead that needs informing.


We love you Anna!


Name can be friendlier, tui looks nice!


Watch the video or read this report from Human Rights Watch [1].

> The Trump administration claimed that the majority of Venezuelans sent to CECOT were members of the Venezuelan organized crime group Tren de Aragua.

> Only [3.1% of the 226/252 Venezuelan prisoners in CECOT] had been convicted of a violent or potentially violent offense.

> Human Rights Watch reviewed documents in 58 of the 130 documented cases of people held in CECOT, and all indicated that they did not have criminal records in Venezuela or other countries in Latin America.

CECOT was already found to violate the UN’s minimum treatment of prisoners rights (aka “The Nelson Mandela Rules”) [2] by a report of the US.

Trump’s administration blatantly violates human rights.

Finally, here is a report investigating why the US can use the El Salavador prison [3].

> It has been clear from the beginning what Trump wants from El Salvador: an ally who would accept, and even imprison, deportees. Less clear has been what Bukele might want from the United States. In striking the deal with the Salvadoran president, Trump has effectively undercut the Vulcan investigation and shielded Bukele from further scrutiny, current and former U.S. officials said.

[1] https://www.hrw.org/report/2025/11/12/you-have-arrived-in-he...

[2] https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Ne...

[3] https://www.propublica.org/article/bukele-trump-el-salvador-...


Exactly, usually for my UC, Burp is enough. Even the Community Edition works great.


> not every company needs to do deep tech innovation, and not every company should.

Yet everyone complains how they got slashed by their competition, and that is primarily because they didn’t innovate. Their product wasn’t better.

> It's about whether you think the FTC/Lina Khan was right to oppose Amazon acquiring iRobot, and whether they bear any responsibility for what happened after.

No, you fixate on 1% of the iRobot story. The real issue is that this wall-street mindset made the company a complete sell out, they squeezed every penny, stopped innovating, offshored manufacturing to China, and now they reaped the harvest of what they sowed.

Point a finger to Lina Khan and four of them point back. It’s the unsustainable economic games of the 1% that killed this company, just like many others.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: