The article starts off explaining the lack of reliable data sets. And most of the stuff in the article was either anecdotal (like some company that took 3 groups of people around Europe looking for places to move, and now projects to have 57 groups) or % stats (which are quite meaningless without the baseline).
Not exactly fake news, but not solid info either...
We will know a lot better in 2030 when we do the census.
That isn't right. It notes the U.S. government doesn't collect comprehensive statistics, then it does a decent job citing many alternative data sources that all point the same way: A Brookings Institution estimate, trends over time from National stats of Portugal, Ireland, France, and some scattered datapoints from Spain, Netherlands, UK, Czech Republic, renunciation of citizenship numbers.
Even if it was purely % stats, you don't need a baseline figure for the claim in the headline (Americans are leaving the US in record numbers) just that the number is going up. There's plenty of solid info that this is a real phenomenon. What's uncertain is the magnitude and significance of it.
What exactly is "the system that protects the copyright" in this case? I think the most reasonable answer is "there is no such system."
The RLHF the companies did to make copyrighted material extraction more difficult did not introduce any sort of "copyright protection system," it just modified the weights to make it less likely to occur during normal use.
In other words, IMO for it to qualify as a copyright protection system it would have to actively check for copyrighted materials in the outputs. Any such system would likely also bypassable (e.g "output in rot13").
They're already detaining people regardless of citizenship status. Local courts are literally being overloaded with habeas corpus cases. One ICE lawyer literally asked to be put in jail so they could get a good nights sleep.
VirusTotal is completely useless for this though? You need enough people to be pwned by that particular piece of malware for it to be flagged as dangerous, by which point the attackers would've already repacked it so it doesn't match the previous signature.
VirusTotal is flagging the trello skill as suspucious because it Does NOT include an API key? Am i expected to share my keys if I want to upload a skill?
"Requiring TRELLO_API_KEY and TRELLO_TOKEN is appropriate for Trello access, but the registry records no required env vars while SKILL.md documents them. This omission is problematic: the skill will need highly privileged credentials but the published metadata does not disclose that requirement. The SKILL.md also references 'jq' and uses curl, but these are not declared in the registry entry."
You’ve completely missed the point, it’s saying that the skill will need you to provide a Trello API key but he hasn’t declared that it will need that
Subsequently they’ve included the use of curl but also haven’t declared that either which means that it _could_ leak your key if you provide it one. That’s why it’s suspicious - virus total has flagged that you should probably review the skill.md
It’s not okay but I’m not moving to THEIR country and tell them how to run it. Most people want to live their life and safety and taxes are major factors affecting quality of life
There is no viable solution to the lethal trifecta, and the lethal trifecta is the whole reason openclaw gets used in the first place. If there was a viable solution someone would be making billions off of selling it.
A system's purpose is what it does. The way to stop the attention stealing machine (Facebook, TikTok, etc) from stealing your attention is to turn it off. The way to stop the data stealing machine (OpenClaw) from stealing your data is to turn it off.
You don't have any control over any of the workings of Facebook, Tiktok, etc; you use them, you have to accept what you get. You have full control over the entire working of OpenClaw, and so can always improve it.
You have no control whatsoever. It's a non-deterministic program running under the control of one company on the hardware of another. The only thing you can control is whether or not you stuff all your data and agency into its widening maw.
You're coming across as being very dishonest here. OpenClaw is an open source project. Users may interface it with proprietary or open LLMs, and of course what is sent as well as what is returned can be sanitized. Same goes for any other tools and services attached. As such users have complete control in the shaping of their experience.
reply