Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | forgotAgain's commentslogin

I see it more as scratching an itch.


Is the trade off worth it? Is removing the pain of building with Cgo worth giving up the dependability and support of C based SQLite?

I don't see how but I'm curious to what others think.


They could be but if network connection was a prime cause Microsoft would have highlighted that fact. Have they shown that is in fact the primary issue?


I've had some experience dealing with the Weather Service when trying to develop a weather app using https://www.weather.gov/documentation/services-web-api#. It was a frustrating experience and my initial impulse was to vent about that. But I'm choosing not to do that mainly because it seemed at the time that every person that I dealt with at NWS was trying to do the best they could.

The situation that NWS is facing is basically that massive tax cuts coupled with growth in defense and social programs has left most other areas of the federal government hollowed out. The amount of money needed to fix the problem being discussed here is minimal but after decades of budget cuts across non-defense and non social-welfare programs there is simply little left to invest in improving services.


Per https://hackernews.hn/item?id=25375739 -

>>> The Weather Service held a public forum Tuesday to discuss the proposal and answer questions. When asked about the investment in computing infrastructure that would be required for these limits to not be necessary, agency officials said a one-time cost of about $1.5 million could avert rate limits. The NOAA budget for fiscal 2020 was $5.4 billion.

They do, in fact, appear to have the money.


How many of those dollars are going to satellites and Doppler radars? Those aren't exactly cheap.


> They do, in fact, appear to have the money.

$5.4 billion is indeed a huge number but gives no information as to the availability of the $1.5 million. Without knowing what the cost is of what they must accomplish with the $5.4 billion no conclusions can be drawn.


Over the years the problem hasn't been a shortage of revenue, its been runaway costs. Adding further revenue is just wasting more money. Cut the costs of an inefficient bureaucracy (the MTA) and bloated labor structure (the transit workers union) if you want to solve the problem.


It's also why I don't trust sales figures on individual products from companies with a portfolio. Sales tend to get credited to products that the company wants to show as gaining traction while really the favored product was an add-on to a bundle of established products that had their license renewed.


absolutely. One thing that does temper this is that companies want to disproportionately reward the strategic businesses, so Microsoft will likely give higher commissions for selling Microsoft Teams than SQL Server. They have controls to prevent gaming that internally, although obviously not 100% effective.


That looks very interesting. Thank you.


This highlights the commoditization of parts that will be part of EV market changes as well as the plug and play nature of EV assemblies. Massive changes to the current ways we build and maintain vehicles.


The idea of trusting any institution whose naked reason for existing is making money is absurd

How ironic that the idea that businesses only exists to make money for their owners came from the same institution as the article.


The shareholder value myth emerged from Chicago, not Harvard, FWIW.


Thank you for the correction. I was referring to Jensen and Meckling https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=94043 but the basis was Friedman.


Original source has a question mark at the end of the title.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: