Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | enonko's commentslogin

The company's business model had nothing to do with domain squatting. It is enough to have a single domain to do huge amounts arbitrage. Or should I say "it was enough". :)

By the way, there still is a number of smaller companies doing Google->Yahoo arbitrage with Yahoo's quiet approval.


It would be interesting to see what happened to that if Google bought Yahoo.


They could start arbitraging into second tier networks, like FindWhat or LookSmart. But it's unlikely that this will actually work in practice. The bids in those networks are too low.

Another way of doing it (and that's how some arbitragers are structuring it even now) is to have two or more separate companies, with different billing addresses and access respective Google accounts using different IPs.


Not any time soon. Domain traffic converts well for many advertisers.


What puzzles me is that it tells you to go to Seattle first, instead of just jumping into the water right there in San Diego...


There's only one three star joint on the west coast and while it's not far from Mountain View, it's definitely not Google's cafeteria. :)


French Laundry?


Yes. I've been to 6 three-star places over the last few years, but FL takes the cake.


AFAIK Google trends normalizes to total search volume. Therefore, it probably means that more and more people who use Google don't care about programming languages.


If you like Core Wars you might also be interested in Tierra, which was one of the first large scale experiment in artificial evolution. http://life.ou.edu/tierra/


Next time they will not link directly to you but redirect through something. Or simply copy-and-paste your content into the job description. It's a waste of time trying to fight this...


Who cares? It's fun.

Same with pranks at the office. Total waste of time, but huge morale boosters.


It might have been more effective to redirect them to a randomly chosen product description from a set of, say, fifty. They'd likely have wasted a lot of Turk time rewording those fifty descriptions before realizing what was going on.


I am. What kind of developments do you think are worth mentioning?


Um... Or you could use Google Trends. http://google.com/trends/


I don't see why this would be much better than simply doing fuzzy match on a trie.


How do you do a fuzzy match? Are there any sites out there that deal with all the text matching algorithms? I need to do this for a project.


No websites, probably, but lots of papers. A good start might be http://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.851/spring07/lec.html (lectures 8 and 9 or so).


Thanks.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: