Considering the mercury and arsenic in all coal, wood is preferred in ovens.

I read that, and it’s one thing to advocate for relaxation over scarcity when, say, the Gini index shows decreasing inequity.

But the organized right-wingers regularly talking about scarcity. The unelected deep state DOGE operatives who have never run for office. Does contradicting the narrative about scarcity necessarily mean undermining the top billionaires?

That’s up to the masses. I’ve done what I can so far and so far its working

The California law does apply to existing OS, right?

They should be proactively marketing the best parental controls on the market.

Nit: introducing a user account field is not the same as the system bus. It’s in ~/.identity and might be absent altogether.

I didn’t see maroon on there for anesthesiologists.

I don’t think the church would consider the broad contours of Darby heretical. It’s not heretical to talk about many antichrists plus one final Antichrist.

It's quite conservative. Liberalism means I can use my device with no laws in between.

Not conservative (there's nothing traditional about this) or liberal, just surveillance authoritarianism.

> surveillance authoritarianism.

last i checked thats what their so called "traditional values" and "conservatism" were actually.

In the past, children were not allowed their own phone. To be particularly cautious, smartphones have not proven a net good; and we're 20 years in.

Amazing how outdated that document became. We all knew it was written for an audience of one, but still such transparent Emperors New Clothes vibe.

This is exactly right. The liar who lies to control the narrative is lying again. The chance he’s lying is high but as adults the (likelihood * hazard) of an invasion is worth preparing for.

The narrative he wanted to control was about Epstein. Denmark could have simultaneously prepared for that, but it wouldn’t be on OSInt Twitter.

The problem is that his "lies" and "jokes" sometimes suddenly turned out to be not lies and jokes.

More precisely, propaganda is always fake. After verification it’s possibly true, but it still began fake. Trump could try supporting his utterances with fact, but he doesn’t.

It’s rational to prepare for his propaganda to sometimes accidentally turn out true. Hence this relatively modest response. But the narrative most reliably supported by fact is that Trump hasn’t kept his story straight about Epstein.