HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more engineer_22's commentslogin

If we could put ourselves in the shoes of the people in charge in these places. We'll probably all agree we as the Government have a vested interest in maintaining social stability. One key to this is maintaining access to potable water. Sick and diseased people won't rebel, but they'll be unable to carry out ordinary functions, you'll be vulnerable to outside forces. In periods of drought access to food is affected, the population might get restless, again, we'll be happier if they're placid so let's make sure water is available. If we know our water system is threatened we'll use any method available to ensure access to water is not interrupted. Seek advice of a soothe-sayer, sacrifice to the gods, take IMF loans, go to war with a neighbor. If none of these things is successful, the situation is dire. The people will become dissatisfied, if they organize and obtain weapons we could see violence. At worst we could lose our heads, or at best flee to a wealthy country but leave behind our power. Therefore, we'll appoint our best people to manage and maintain our water system.


A comic book about USA invading Canada?


over water specifically


Even more adults would be flagged as children.


Is it a conspiracy theory that Bitcoin was developed by the US military as a hedge against US dollar hyperinflation? I've heard that argument made somewhere but maybe it was just a rumor to try to legitimize Bitcoin?


> Is it a conspiracy theory that Bitcoin was developed by the US military as a hedge against US dollar hyperinflation?

Yes, none of that makes an iota of sense. If a military wants to take inflation into its own hands, it has far-better options. From hoarding to, you know, taking shit.


> the current administration blew up our nascent new energy industry.

Which industry is that?


Solar, wind, and grid-attached battery.

In the late teens, China was dominating all of these industries.

Under policies of the Biden administration, these industries were growing domestically in the US and we were increasing our share of the global market.

Over the last year those domestic industries have been destroyed. They are barely surviving and have stopped rapidly expanding. All gains made against China's dominance in these technologies has been lost, and then some.


Any links to data on these claims?


Plenty. Which specific data are you looking for?


Which part?


I think you've hit on a good point. As a society we're still trying to figure out how to rule ourselves in the age of Social Media.

Let's pray we're able to figure it out before more blood is shed.


> What were you thinking? What was going through your heads? I'm genuinely curious

Many people were thinking Joe Biden was looking old... Until 2 months before the election when a faceless political elite replaced him with a candidate who had repeatedly lied about Joe Biden looking old. The American public might be stupid, but they don't like being treated as though they are stupid - which is exactly what the DNC did.


> the US isn't flooded with BYD electric cars from China. China's dirt cheap labor could decimate the US auto industry,

What you're describing is called "dumping", and it's a strategy China has used to varying degrees of success in other markets in order to destabilize foreign industries. It could be seen as an act of war.

Chinese labor is not actually so cheap anymore, many other developing nations are significantly less expensive. But China's secret weapon is total control and coordination across industries. They use this to subsidize target industries for the export market. You've highlighted automakers, but they also target steel, aluminum, and others. To a casual observer it almost appears as if they were targeting industries that could be readily adapted to wartime production.


> what is left to monetise?

Low latency, high bandwidth


From white paper:

>At its core, BitChat leverages the Noise Protocol Framework (specifically, the XX pattern) to establish mutually authenticated, end-to-end encrypted sessions between peers.


I actually wrote a Noise implementation and someone wanted to make a Bitchat implementation with it, but my impl only supports BLAKE2B (and I got the impression this person really didn't know what they wanted to do in the first place). It's kinda sad more haven't moved to BLAKE2B (or BLAKE3, which I almost never hear anyone talking about).


Wasn't BLAKE2s recommended on the Noise mailing list, being faster for low volume messages, even on 64-bit?


I'd have to check but I believe so.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: