> need something to help me make sense of them, integrate them, reformat, do a "semantic refactoring" across files, diffs. etc

I'm building this exact thing. Heavily inspired by obsidian (and the obsidian workflow where you launch claude code in your vault), but with a leaner UX, and a web-first app. Not launched yet, but I'll let you know when I do.

As someone else building a notes app, I went with CodeMirror because I enjoy the feature-set of the obsidian editor (which is CodeMirror), and I'm trying to emulate the features on that that I use the most, in addition to some more "experimental" features I'm currently playing with.

Personally, I really don't enjoy WYSIWIG editors when writing notes. It's just unnecessarily different compared to what I'm used to. Though I can see non-devs enjoying it more.

You're allowed to like both. Antinote is very unique, and devs should be allowed to charge for their work if it's a quality app with a really polished UX.

Also, its not theirs.

The entire docs is gpt/claude-esque. It's gonna take a significant amount of work rewriting it all, all for a free tool.

I think it fits fine with the type of app this is. Sure some people might be slightly put off, and there is a bit of fluff sprinkled in everywhere, but I think it's fine.

What perfect timing. Looks extremely well curated too.

> This hyperbole is not really necessary on hackernews

I've noticed that hyperbole is increasingly getting frontpaged as of these past 6-10 months.

How does the E2E work in terms of user flow? I assume a you need a password?

Do you need to enter the password every time you open this?

You can start using it right away without a password (it will generate a random one and use it only once to encrypt a DEK key). Once you create an account with a password, it re-encrypts your DEK and uploads it to Supabase (encrypted). Later on you only need to enter your password again if you sign out and want to sync with other devices.

Because people keep buying their generic hardware, and random youtubers keep recommending their stuff.

How about we just stop buying anything logitech. What other peripheral company has squandered their resources as much as they have, completely refusing to innovate?

Use kanata (github.com/jtroo/kanata). It's software remapping and works on any keyboard (including built-in laptop keyboards).

Great docs, incredible feature set (literally 50x the capabilities of any logitech first party remapper), and very lightweight.

> Such great hardware

Every other mouse brand I've used (razer, hyperx, reddragon, steelseries) has outlasted my logitech-G mice, and felt noticeably better built. Their keyboards are the most generic, nothing-special keyboards for any company of that size. They don't innovate.

I will never buy a logitech mouse/keyboard ever, especially with the options we have today.

It's so tiring hearing people praise their hardware when they've literally been outcompeted for a decade at this point. Their webcams, and other niche stuff (like flight sticks) may be fine, but their mice/keyboard are below average.

Nobody makes thumb trackballs as good as Logitech, or at least not anymore. And I have no complaints about the quality. I have three MX Ergos, replacing my previous Logitech trackballs that all lasted well over 10 years of daily use (the left click switches started getting iffy, but that's probably fixable, so I kept them).

I barely ever hear someone complain about the hardware quality of Logitech mice and keyboards, even before considering how much of them there are compared to Keychrons, Duckys, or all the gamer brands.

The MX Ergo form factor is the best, by the way. Few people go back to pushy-pully mice after they got a taste of how fast and precise they can be with a thumb trackball. I always find it interesting where I see them on TV or YouTube: medical laboratories, architectural offices, movie studios... and Louis Rossmann's desk. I've been using them since the 90s and they probably were an unfair advantage in FPS LAN parties =D

Interesting! Is there a good, ergonomic mouse that completes with Logitech's MX? I did hear they wear off quickly, which is why I never bought one, but I also never bothered to check for alternatives since everyone said MX is best by far.

I personally don't enjoy most ergonomic mice, almost entirely because of the weight.

I used to be the type of person that liked mice with >3 side buttons and programmable firmware and all that, with a shape that fit my hand, but lately I'm of the mindset that anything that can be done with a keyboard (or voice) should just be done on the keyboard.

I enjoy lightweight gaming-focused mice. Just anything cheap and light, and on the go, I just use my trackpad. Absolutely no reason to spend 90 bucks on a mouse unless you do most of your work on a mouse.

Plenty of people buy Logitech out of inertia or just because their devices are everywhere in retail so it's not really about build quality for them. If you care even a little about software customizability or not running weird vendor daemons on your system the alternatives tend to be less miserable to live with long-term.

Nobody sane is attached to their keyboard after the third time the RGB config stops working because of some cloud update or USB glitch anyway.

I've been using my MX518 for 15 years. I have several stocked away when this dies.

That's one from the good old days. I was a full on logitech fan back then too, it's sad what the company has turned into.

Thats funny. I have a mx master 3 and its handsdown the best workmouse i have ever had. I work in strange places and the mouse works on every surface. Even glass, mirrors, server doors, skin, pants. I hate the app with a passion and use BTT.