Every time I read about codex it's someone saying the extra limits ended that day. I'm not saying you're wrong in this instance

It reminds me of the guy who replaced his static blog deployment scripts with asking chatgpt to generate the html from his text based on a template, and said that he isn't sure that the llm isn't changing his writing but hopes it isn't

And yet so many companies spent the last decade doing it to fit into AWS pricing models

Ironically this is accidentally begging the question - that breaking them up into LLM context windows would be good because it would be to fit them in LLM context windows.

Maybe you're right but I'm aghast at how much of engineering over the last 15 years has been breaking up working monoliths to fit better within the budget of an external provider (first it was AWS). Those prices can change.

There are good reasons to use microservices but so often they're used for the wrong reasons.

Even bookz aee ruined for me now. I was reading careless people and hate all the emdashes even though in a book it's just normal

I want someone to do this with SimCopter. I loved that game but I don't think it was very popular

Have you seen this? http://krimsky.net/patchers/scx.html

SimCopter was the best game!! You could even fly around your own simcity build!

The Neo won't sell dozens of models they will take the low end laptop market by storm. I think your comment will age very poorly

This exactly. No other laptop comes close on price for the hardware you get. Yeah you may get more ram in a PC but promise you it won’t feel as fast when you’re using it day to day or have as good of a display or battery life.

In same price range you can get a PC that not only has more ram but also has better multicore performance, better disk speed and better port selection. Yes neo wins on build quality, trackpad, speaker, display and battery life but the PC would also allow you to install any linux distro.

So the Neo wins on things people care about

The Neo is already considered a huge success and is the reason for the scarcity.

When the exploit is an advertisement for an exploit detection company, not doing the right thing is a bad look

The worst thing would be to exploit or sell it for profit. Instead of that, publicizing the exploit is closer to neutral–good in my books, that did trigger a really quick reaction from the different actors to patch their kernels and systems

Imagine how much quicker the distros would have reacted if they were given a heads up a month ago. But, sure, I guess kudos to this company for not being actively criminal, and merely bumblingly incompetent and overly eager to get their marketing pitch out the door.

to which distros? how do you ensure fairness? Do you report this to the maintainer of Red Star OS (north korea)?

The kernel security team was given the heads up a month ago. At that point it is their decision.

There are channels like the distro security mailing list https://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros for this purpose.

It's always annoyed me that maths has loopholes around infinity to keep it consistent

It's been going on for a while, but a couple of weeks ago they announced it would be expanded to other sports, that's probably why