Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dublinben's commentslogin

Behavior by cyclists certainly has a bias towards survivorship. Every other vehicle on the road represents a potentially lethal threat at any time.

Inadequate dedicated infrastructure for cyclists leads to behavior like "Idaho stops" that look counterintuitive to drivers, but improves safety for cyclists at intersections.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop


You did not read the thread did you? I have asked how is this supposed to improve safety, this is what is this thread about.

Horse-drawn busses predate private automobiles by almost a hundred years.[0] The movement to pave roads was started by bicyclists decades before the rise of the automobile.[1] Cars usurped preexisting infrastructure and drove out other road users, like trolleybusses and streetcars.

We have so thoroughly remade society in the service of cars that it can be difficult to recognize any possible alternative.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsebus

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Roads_Movement


Paved roads have been around for thousands of years longer than the bicycle.

> Horse-drawn busses predate private automobiles by almost a hundred years.

And they used roads that already existed for transit and transport. People have always built roads.

> Cars usurped preexisting infrastructure and drove out other road users, like trolleybusses and streetcars.

This is some significant historical revisionism. You’re making it sound like all the roads were built for buses and streetcars.

The good roads movement is certainly interesting history. But I don’t think it changes the reality that buses are only workable because they are mostly piggybacking on infrastructure buit for other vehicles.

Of course, that’s rather the point of roads, that they are infrastructure that benefits many forms of transit and transportation.


Roads that have existed for hundreds or thousands of years certainly weren't built for cars.


Unfortunately it sounds like this program is designed to maximize revenue for the private vendor, not make roads safer by changing driver behavior. The county is also using this surface-level fix as an excuse to avoid more fundamental road design changes that would actually improve safety for vulnerable road users.

Other automated enforcement mechanisms like average speed cameras and automated tolling are more effective at achieving their purported goals. Ultimately, enforcement will always be secondary to proper road design in both cost and effectiveness.


Unfortunately the example included (geekatlas.com) appears to be long gone, so we're not able to enjoy this ourselves.



The EU is still buying billions of dollars of fossil fuels and other resources from Russia.[0]

[0] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/3/how-much-of-europes...


Nefarious actions by others shouldn't justify your own. We can do better.


It's a matter of scale. Objectively, yandex is a great resource, and Kagi's results would be degraded without it. Pennies per user go to them. The sum of the entire money that has ever transferred from Kagi to yandex is what? 30 seconds of EU oil and gas purchases?

In short: pick smart battles.


Sony Pictures Core and Kaleidescape are as close as it gets, and both require expensive proprietary hardware.


That's really disappointing; I have zero interest in allowing a device like that on my network, or in spending that much on hardware for a single proprietary service that could go away or change its terms, or in having a service that only works with one device rather than many services that all work on the same device (e.g. Android TV).

Sigh. Where's the video equivalent of music stores for "just let me buy a high-quality DRM-free download I actually own" already?


That’s corporate for “would you like to discuss this off the record away from public view?”

Especially with a non-native English speaker who may be more comfortable expressing themselves in writing asynchronously.


Absolutely. Rule #1, always leave a paper trail when talking with companies. The social contract is long broken, there is no room for "off the record".




>Do people need training to use a calculator?

Yes? Quite a bit of time was spent in math classes over the years learning to use calculators. Especially the more complicated functions of so-called graphing calculators. They're certainly not self-explanatory.

What does it say about your skill or the depth of this tool that you haven't gotten better at using it after 2 years of practice?


One of this article claims that failure of AI projects is because the companies failed to train employees for AI. You do get value out of calculators without training. The training is there so you can unlock advanced more complicated functions.

The article come across as "AI can not fail, it can only be failed" argument.


Even on just normal calculators.

Quick, without looking it up, can you tell me what the {mc, m+, m-, mr} buttons do? If you're asking "the what buttons?" or "that's not on my calculator" then we have an answer. If you do know these, did you just intuit them or did you learn them from some instruction? If you really did intuit them, do you really think that's how most people do it? (did you actually intuit them...)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: