Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ddalex's commentslogin

"they only be stealing a tiny amount so not worth doing anything"

Because the economics are simply not there.

There is not enough money in space exploration, let's be real. SpaceX biggest customer is itself. Hence the vaporware about datacenters in space.


> understanding that this is one infinitesimally small cost

They are stealing your money with make believe numbers, but just suck it up.


what can it do ? it's just a big set of numbers, if you trust the host that's good enough

If you are ok with everything being fed into it being stored forever I guess it’s no problem. I don’t see how you trust them if you don’t know them.

Who is "them" here? The developers and the hosts are not the same.

(And either one is a threat vector)

where would it be stored ? it's just a big set of numbers.

If the repo is already forked, what difference does it make if Google supports it or not? The community can just continue development if they so choose


google can kill your account for using an unsupported harness when/if they choose


Complete bs. Gemini models are on OpenRouter just like any other models.


But then you have to pay by the token instead of the subsidized subscription prices


oh, so finally it is about money not open source.


It's the code they develop going forward that matters.


In fact, more then what the call seller expects, not the market.


LLMs can play chess, Gemini 3.1 Pro reaches an accuracy on 96.9 on chess.com and wins regularly against stockfish 18 set on elo 2000


Quantity is a quality of its own.

Maybe there is enough plane onboard capacity to deal with just 50 batteries, let's say; multiply the failure rate expected and the pax capacity of the plane and you get how many batteries you can afford to have onboard and still be able to deal with worst case scenario.


Don't assign to malice what can be explained by incompetence:

* new automated UX experiments starts * the UI bot made a change that made the page unscrollable * the experiment has a much higher rate of retention then the control (because people can't scroll) * the experiment is deemed a success by results analysis (no one looks at the page to see WHY) * the experiment is blessed as the new pipeline

Such an obvious business improvement made by Gemini !


How about "don't assign to incompetence the malice that can result in big bucks"


>Don't assign to malice what can be explained by incompetence:

OK, if it is a bug, what are the different time frames for people experiencing this pretty serious bug?


> You could prototype this in a few hundred lines of python.

You mean Claude can one-shot this.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: