I built ClearAudio to make prompt-based audio cleanup practical. Upload audio, describe what you want ("keep the voice, remove the crowd"), and it separates it out. I stripped it down to the essentials with a minimal 1-bit UI—no extra features, just the core separation.
The main draw for me with elysia was that it maintains bun's perf benefits unlike express. When I got into the weeds of the documentation, their abstractions could use a lot of polish. The lifecycle of a request is not that clear imo and all the hooks you put into it look like hacks rather than integrations.
I would reconsider using Elysia. I was also very excited by it and I thought it would be great but it has got errors and issues with different library versions and things like that. Also the whole Eden thing doesn't work for me for whatever reason. I have a monorepo. Typescript keeps complaining. Also if everything is defined in a single file, then it works well. If it's in different files, it breaks the whole type side of things.
Huh? It works fine across different modules. It helps to read the documentation thoroughly. I don't mean that to sound snarky, but it's likely you missed something if you're not able to modularize your route types.
I recently created a product that has picked up some traction. The name of the tool is a character from a famous comic book. The characters name is trademarked. I'm from the UK. My tool is an analytics tool. Does this run the risk of me getting sued by the comic book company?
You can be threatened or sued for pretty much anything - if they care, are bought by someone who cares (ie Disney) or in the future start caring then you might be sued. Whether it goes anywhere or whether you win is a different matter.
Trademarks are based on a class of product or thing however (see eg the goods and services listing on https://trademarks.justia.com/875/27/iron-87527652.html - one of a bunch of iron man trademarks), so if there's no confusion/it's not a category that they have trademarked, then your odds are better.
If you want legal advice, you should seek out a trademark attorney. In general, though, you'd be infringing if the company has the name registered for use in your industry.
Thanks! Replit (and Glitch) are cool but ultimately they didn't pass our sniff test for production use cases. We believe our serverless architecture sets the foundation for the Napkin function to be a LEGO-like block to build complex systems at scale. We also like the idea of a simple isolated unit that can be shared. It's more lightweight, more understandable, and we'll be exploring ways to tackle discovery in the coming months :)
"Hey, that's nice", "How's that going?" or something like it.
Also, no response is also a response, you could just listen to them. No one's going to say "I just started taking guitar lessons" and remain silent for the rest of the evening; for sure they have much more to say about it.
Why is it self-absorbed for someone to include themselves in the conversation, but it's not self-absorbed for you to come up to me and talk to me about your guitar playing?
You can come up to me and say, "Hey, guess what!? I just started playing guitar!" And I can't say, "No kidding? My mom just started playing guitar, too!" or, "No way! I just started drumming a few weeks ago. Maybe we can jam soon?"
How is my response "self-absorbed" but you starting a conversation about yourself isn't?
If you start the conversation, I'm just supposed to keep asking you questions about your experience until you're done talking about it?
I mean, if we're friends, shouldn't you care about what I think is relevant as much as I should care about what you think is relevant?
And anyway, if you _really_ want to talk about how it's going - can't you just take the conversation there?
I understand if you say something like, "Nice. I've always wanted to learn to play, and I never thought I could, and already I've learned so much, and I'm getting close to being able to play my favorite song."
And I say, "Oh, cool. Hopefully you can play my favorite song next. But it's really hard, you'll probably need a few years. You know, I used to be friends with Kurt Cobain's assistant, right? That's how I got into music in the first place....."
^ That seems self-absorbed. The first seems like genuine conversation.
I would say that in the best case we would take turns sharing about something personally important and being listened to and engaged with where we're at instead of quickly pulled off in another direction. For a bit anyway, before you get the ball.
I think the core of this question is generosity of time and attention, each person's ability to suspend their solipsism and engage with the other person as a person of equal importance to themselves. A good conversation is an act of intimacy.
We all want to be heard but no one ever seems to want to do the listening.
reply