HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | azernik's commentslogin

> Host services elsewhere, and ignore claims that a country's laws extend beyond its borders

The moment you want to collect money from people in a country, their laws extend to you. You do not get to export electronics to France and ignore their RF spectrum allocations, for example.


That article is making quite a stretch from "the laws have exceptions for intelligence agencies, police, and the military" to "EU politicians will use those exceptions for themselves". It does this with zero evidence.

You did not ask about driver's licenses. You asked about "document I have on me".

Many people in many countries carry their national ID card in instances where Americans would carry their driver's license.

(And, to be clear, if you are American and drive, your driver's license contains your address.)


In 2008-9 Republicans did not even make the pretense of Obama being a threat to democracy. (Which would have been absurd in a way it isn't for Trump, who tried to overthrow an election he lost.)


I remember when some lady called Obama "Muslim" (in the same tone of voice as she'd say "demon" or something) and Mitt Romney took the microphone from her and said "no, no, we disagree politically but he's a good man."

Shows how poorly those politicians understood the constituency they were fomenting. He was boo'd for it by people that had come to see him specifically, and about 15 years later, republican voters built a scaffold outside the Capital they were breaking into while chanting about hanging the Republican vice president.

I feel like American politicians often play with fire without understanding its nature as something that burns.


They did a bit more than "criticize the government".


Why do you think USAID of all groups was involved in election meddling? Their involvement in US foreign policy is usually along the lines of PR and sometimes being used as cover.


The entire point of USAID was to be a central clearinghouse for funding U.S. government pet projects so that the CIA/DoD/DoS stopped funding opposite sides against each other. Didn't always work (See the Middle East), but that's why it exists.


That was not, in fact, the point of USAID. Nor its function in reality.


NATO only guarantees the mutual defense of its neighbors.

I presume you mean the UN? They can only actually do anything about international law violations if no permanent UNSC member vetoes it. The US is a permanent member, so...


The leaks that led to the article


Leaks about a military buildup are only possible if there's an actual military buildup. Unless the leaks are false. Is there any indication the information is false?


Military buildups can also happen without leaks.

Leaks can be a strategy to turn a military buildup into political/psychological leverage.


The strategy could be buildup + leak. The leak by itself isn't the strategy unless it's giving false information.

The buildup requires much more effort than the leak. So in the buildup + leak strategy, the vast majority of effort goes to the buildup, not the leak.


They paid lots of secretaries lots of money and had a whole department called "the mailroom".

No one wants to go back to that.


When they're managing nuclear bombs, I think some inefficiency shouldn't be a deal breaker.


This is how buzzword bingo has always worked. The eternal curse of the computer industry (especially software).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: