Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ako's commentslogin

I think the Appstore was planned all along, just did not fit in the first release, so they adapted the launching narrative to: "the browser is enough for all 3rd party software".

No, Steve was very vocally against it until jailbreaks forced the issue. It’s well documented.

Vocally public yes… but they wanted to see what the diy scene created, how the power users were using the device and letting them develop the ideas and implement… they would open up and co-opt… boss tools is your drag down for all your settings case in point. This has been openly admitted to in interviews after the fact.

They 100% did not let the power users and DIY scene exist. It only existed by exploiting OS security vulnerabilities. Every new iOS release required finding a new way to crack it. That's why a lot of people chose Android.

For the first year, Scott Forstall, the Senior Vice President in charge of the iPhone's software, very directly encouraged companies like Pandora[0] to jailbreak iPhones in order to get a head start on app development, protected that community from Steve Jobs' ire, and then used the existence and popularity of jailbreaking to convince Steve that a sandboxed app store would be a better idea than Apple writing every single app for the iPhone[1].

Once native APIs were available, that was true, but before it was even clear that the iPhone would have an app store, they very much did let it flourish.

[0]: https://www.macrumors.com/2021/03/03/scott-forstall-pandora-...

[1]: https://mjtsai.com/blog/2026/04/06/apple-creating-all-the-ap...


[citation needed]

See this comment in the same thread for sources: https://hackernews.hn/item?id=48541563

Sure, they’ll say whatever is needed to sell the products they have.

Apparently not enough people want what you want, that is also democracy, accepting that things other people want can be prioritized,

That is true, but it also means that multiple parties does not solve the problem of the parent to my first comment in this thread which as "You can pick which of the two possibilities, neither of which is even close to your political views, will oppress you for the next 4 years.".

Yes, you get to say what you want, but that doesn’t mean you get what you want. With millions of people all saying something different, nobody gets exactly what they want.

Most relevant question in today's world seems to me how to create incorruptible governments?

Organizations are organizations in the end, so hopefully you'll find something relevant in the book too.

As far as i know Claude Code also uses LSP and tree-sitter to find things in your source code.

If you install LSP. AFAIR their first versions used some kind of treee/structure for easy search, but they found out that grep was better/similar but with less complications (they now ship some kind of grep).

People "happily" spend that on drugs, tobacco, and alcohol, so why not on porn.

True, but people are more willing to spend that kind of money $20-50 at a time than all at once.

Sign up for Apple Card and you can purchase on a payment plan.

True, maybe bundle it with an OF account?

Makes me think of Peter Tosh: "Anything you can do, I can do it better, I'm the toughest".

Anything you can do I can do better just makes me think of Annie Oakley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO23WBji_Z0

Tool use score is 17.4% that seems really low, what does that mean?

I think Amazon is doing ok as the cloud where most customers run their LLM. I think a lot of companies are using e.g., Anthropic models on Bedrock so it lives inside their AWS cloud.

It’s better, it’s useful even for those who don’t have a deep knowledge of computers. I’d expect more AI users than programmers, than ms-word users, than excel users.

You are confusing "using AI" with "running LLM locally".

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: