Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | _fizz_buzz_'s commentslogin

Obviously 48VDC has been around and internally they will probably still step down to 48V. But these 48V islands are nowadays inter connected by regular AC grid. They want to replace that interconnection with a 800VDc bus. I kind of assume they chose 800vdc because there are already bunch of stuff available from EVs which also have 800vdc battery packs now.

They chose 800VDC because it's a convenient multiple that is the peak possible with a two-level 650V (probably GaN) FET arrangement.

And why is 650V special?

Historical, physical, engineering reasons.

Much of the world's mains-voltage electronics run at 240V (historical) and have PFC circuits (which are essentially just boost converters) that run at ~400V DC link voltages. 650V gives you enough headroom to tolerate overshoots and still have an 80% safety margin with a single level topology.

This voltage also coincidentally is a convenient crossover point where silicon MOSFETs start to become inefficient and GaN FETs have recently become feasible and mass-produced.


Maybe not, but more than 99.999999% of humans would also not come up with that.

5mins is really as good as it has to be. Almost everyone needs a bathroom break or gets a drink/snack after 400miles.

Its also fast enough that I don't have to plan for it. I could be running errands, note a low charge, and unless I'm in a big hurry stop for a charge.

I sometimes spend 3-5 minutes washing all the windows. But I do dream of making F1-style pit stops on my cross-country treks.

And you can do that while charging as there is no need to sit and hold a pump handle.

Sounds like the trick is to use 1.5MW chargers. I guess that'll do it. I suppose the question is how they handel this thermally.

there needs to be battery chemistry improvements. Otherwise, with existing batteries, charging at these speeds will cause too much heat and shorten battery life span. BYD is offering 1.5MW charging with increased battery lifespan and without increasing the heat dissipation requirements. Another improvement compared to current crop of batteries is charge curve. Charging from 80 to 95%, BYD batteries can handle higher power than current batteries at MAX

Huh, I also got exactly 7342 with opus.

Same, 7342. Both in CLI and web

There is still a lot of legacy software out there. I worked on something for a little bit (probably around 10 years ago).

New Delphi software is welcome!

LTSpice is awesome, but the user interface is an acquired taste ...

Seems to be standard in the EDA world. Look up how you copy/paste in Eagle. Or what happens to wires when you move a component in a KiCAD schematic.

Shouldn’t it be possible for AI to filter out that a request is made to portray a real person? That seems almost like a trivial task for a good model. I am sure every now and then something will slip through, but I bet one could make it very close to 100% effective.

Consider the difference between "Generate an image of Emma Watson", "Generate an image of Hermione", and "Generate an image of a female hogwarts witch and student". We're getting less and less specific, but those are all likely to get you an image of Emma Watson.

Your filter has to pick out that, while they did not ask for a specific person, the practical result is likely to be the same. That's going to be tough to get near perfect.


AI development has become an excuse for ignoring consent. Of course it's possible to filter out requests. But culturally with X, it's not remotely likely, unless compelled by regulation with teeth.

I can see how it'd be trivial to block known celebrities, but how do you handle everyone else?

> trivial to block known celebrities

see here for one example: https://hackernews.hn/item?id=47370100


Do you need to? It doesn't know everyone else. Or at least it shouldn't.

I mean a realistic take is to simply not use source images containing people at all.

AIs have been able to invent fictional people longer then they've been able to modify existing images.


> I still see AI making stupid silly mistakes.

Humans also make silly mistakes.


> that we’re now targeting $2M+ gross profit per person

That seems really high. Do they have such moat that nobody can move into their space?


Payment processing is one of the most tightly regulated, and some might say corrupt, industries. Replicating the tech wouldn't be difficult. The social and regulatory part is effectively impossible for anyone who's not already in the inner circle.


Is it hard to break into? Theres tons of tech companies that are playing in that space. Stripe, Braintree, Toast, Adyen, etc.


Ironically Square isn’t good at anything in particular. Square fails to have a good point of sale (Toast wins) and fails for online store fronts (Shopify wins). Square is in a position where they spread themselves thin and aren’t at the top of anything in particular.


With light CRM, Staffing, and Banking tools, it seems like Square's strategy is to be best-of-suite for small businesses rather than best-of-breed.

I've never seen Toast outside of bars/restaurants (although they are ubiquitous in that segment). Every other service or retail shop has been Square, especially farmers markets and craft fairs.


Basically… no vision.

Yeah they’re going nowhere in the long term.


> no vision

Jack's trademark it seems.


Yeah the whole bitcoin stuff is cringe.


Just wait till they start vibe coding more features!


i think they dont have a great moat in their individual offerings, but across square, cash app, and afterpay they offer a pretty good suite of products for the entire transaction stack.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: