Container ships passenger ? You mean as some form of bystander and not in the actual container ? ;)
> They found the isolation allowed them to focus on their tasks better
Isolation in that context is just form of work. But to focus / be productive on something you need to have a lot of expertise and also knowledge of concrete "domain", eg. knowledge of code base. So you need to learn a lot before you can be productive.
> since the internet was limited when away from port
So maybe management is constant and unneeded distraction for proficient workers those days ? Meetings was probably invented to destroy productivity...
Or just average Joe Worker is helpless versus Internet ? And that is the problem called "reality"... Moust peoples are not 1000x programmer that can be left alone for some time and then BOOM some magnificient piece materializes...
Workers just can't be proficient in extended isolation periods. Even management is needed for moust of us... "Work from home" actually is "work less from home". And all that assumes good worker intentions what is naive especially after longer periods of time.
You see, advice like that are "guidelines" - good advices that not to be taken without checking they apply. Really the same as invoking "high horse for too long" case whenever moral advice is encountered...
Life is not only black or only white but staing in "viper nest" destroy you just by learning "doing" methodology by unintentional osmosis.
And "bad" people often do, sometimes consciously, terrible or naive business/tech decisions.
But someone will say good people sometimes also do terrible or naive decisions. Sure, but continuation of such decision (even acquisition/selloff) is most likely to not be a disgust.
Do someone pays for anti-C propaganda ?? All that logic breaking accusations...
Eg. here, from memory:
> ...you want to read 32 bits from file but OH NOOES long is 64 bit ! The language ! The imposibility !
But when you read something ot unserialize some format you just need to know based on format schema or domain knowledge. Simple and straightforward like that ! You do not do some "reflections" on what language standard provide and then expect someone send you just that !!
So that anti-C "movement" is mostly based on brainless exampless.
Not saying C is perfect.
But it is very good and I bet IBM and other big corps will keep selling things written and actively developed in C/C++ + adding hefty consulting fees.
In the meantime proles has been adviced to move to cpu-cycle-eating inferior languages and layers over layers of cycle burning infra in cloud-level zero-privacy and guaranteed data leaks.
Oh, btw. that femous Java "bean" is just object with usually language delivered "basic type"... How that poor programmer from article should know what to read from disc when he just have types Java provides ?? How ? Or maybe he should use some domain knowledge or schema for problem he is trying to solve ??
And in "scripting language" with automatic int's - how to even know how many bits runtime/vm actually use ? Maybe some reflection to check type ? But again how that even helps if there is no knowledge in brain how many bits should be read ?? But calling some cycle burning reflection or virtual and as much as posible indirect things is what fat tigers love the moust :)
Yay, on-premise llms are what is recomended for serious use, at least US gov thinks that :) But rest of us need to pay subscriptions for 3r party businesses passing back and forth our... everything ?
In old days ppl was saying: "I have no secrets" and now we evolved into "I know how to not upload important docs" ;)
EU need to start with own PC hardware factories first. And PC compatible designs. What is unlikely - on first sight of troubles they will buy everything from US. As all good 3rd Word countries do.
All that years (decades?) Python had build-in code executed on install ??? That's functionally adequate to MS autoexec.bat viruses spreading mechanism!
But if AI "module" can be not installed (at all, preferably) and it run games as good as W10 than maybe.
But of course that MS will not sell "modular" os :>>>
reply