I have to wonder though, that kickstarter may not be the best platform for them to get funding for such a project. It seems that most people fund projects on kickstarter because they wish to receive a sample of the soon to be made product, however in this case a long board seems to be geared towards a younger audience, of which usually wouldn't have $1100-$1200 to spend on such a luxury good. Great work though! Would definitely be interesting to see people ride uphill.

I really don't think you've tackled the problem at the correct angle here. Anyone can assign two or more axis to rate things on and call it a better rating system than a one dimensional one because it provides more information. Viewers want more information before deciding whether or not a thing (in this case, a movie) is worth their time. While your two dimensional rating system may work for some, this specific system is only justified for people who want information on "quality" and "rewatchability." For example for a person like me, I don't rewatch movies so the "quality" axis offers me way more value and insight compared to the "rewatchability" side.

Very interesting read. This reminds me back when sometimes loading up a flash video or anything that required a loading sequence sometimes the author would include a quickly loadable little mini-game or activity of sorts to keep the audience occupied as they wait for the full video to finish loading. Seems like a pretty useful concept that can still be applied in today's websites to keep users more engaged.

Hmm I don't know about this website design... This main page says "Everything you wished MailChimp, Constant Contact & Campaign Monitor were doing... but aren't!" For a user like me that doesn't recognize any of those, I have no idea what this site does. There isn't even an "About" link. That's a pretty critical thing you should probably look into, quite a turn off.