The tweet/meme about the face eating leopards seems to be entirely applicable to our current times.

Why would the team apply different strategies if it would not yield any extra points and would probably upset the lower finishing driver ?

We know that in hindsight, but at the time even Lewis asked why they didn't pit one driver.

You left out a step:

Also Trump: We’re cancelling CAFE because it’s woke.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/12/fact-sheet-pr...

The great thing about populist slogans like “drain the swamp” is that they don’t specify what exactly will be done and how, so they are highly malleable.

Could the non-tech stocks be down because the productivity increases expected from AI are illusory? Or that when the bubble bursts the economy will be wrecked and all businesses will be affected?

Couldn’t it be rooster-adjacent?

I love your innocence! :)

I'm struck by how empty the streets are.

That won’t help you if they decide that they don’t like you.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/us-citizen-arrested-by-ice_n_...

That reply uses I/I’m around a dozen times, forcing the user into anthropomorphising the AI.

Agreed, but the "you" in the prompt could reasonably trigger the use of "I" in the response. Not that many people pay that much attention to such things....

I suspect that in a large scale disaster/emergency the communications systems may be disrupted and it may not be possible to remotely control the vehicles.

Perhaps in such cases they can pull over in a safe place, or if they have an occupant ask them if they wish to continue the journey or stop.

Perhaps they already do this, I have no experience with autonomous vehicles.