My guess is bots. Govts and law makers are afraid of the barrage of bots DDOSing them so they are slowly and surely tightening the noose around the internet. I'm all for net neutrality and anonymity on the internet and I don't like the age laws one bit, but I too am afraid of the bots scorching the internet. I still hate these growing dystopian laws but I also want the bots to be driven away from the "human internet" .
I have heard of it for quite some time, I believe an explanation doesn't exists. But what can be the explanation. Any guesses?
Can it be explained without invoking Quantum or other such higher Physics?
What can be its implication (I guess earth also spins hence earth interchanges its magnetic poles because of this phenomena. I'm not sure I'm just wild guessing)
How can we benefit out of it. That is can we build something interesting or profitable out of this phenomena.
Maybe it's just conservation of angular momentum: if you look closely, you can see that the spin axis and the way she applies the force aren't perfectly tangential to the object's axis, so the lower point of the T-shape is "bouncing" between many positions. If I'm not mistaken, this is explained by the "intermediate axis theorem".
I'm sad because you explained it so well. I was expecting something life changing explanation and lot of discussions around it but the simplicity and truth in your answer annihilated the conundrum. I can think of the body having a kind of oscillation in its "angular momentum" around some mean position of the angular momentum. Thank you.
I like your hpdl watch better than the LilyGo watch. As a lover of analog and casio watches I can tell you that your watch can soon build you a loyal following in its current form if you only build 3 such watches and put them on Amazon, etc. and price them at 50$. Next batch of 3 you could try at 100$.
Don't worry about glass cover, our local watch repair guy can easily slap one in it
According to the book, "The House of the Blue Mangoes", written by a man hailing from Kerala (a state in India) and rooted in its rich culture, pointed out to the bare breasting problem as one to the rigid social hierarchy in India and especially in Kerala. The women of the lower castes had to keep the breasts bare in front of the men of the higher castes. That was brutal but also a right fiercely claimed by the men of the higher castes.
I didn't read the article beyond the first few lines but it felt as if the "Nair" helper woman was ridiculously rigid in keeping her upper parts bare but if your read the book, The House of the Blue Mangoes then you'd realise that the people belonging to the Nair community were considered lower to some other castes and therefore it's not the helper woman that was ridiculous, it's just the casteism. She was just being traditional as she was old. I'm not at all versed in the social structure of Kerala. My only source is the book that I mentioned twice.
The article does go on to address this claim that lower-caste women had to keep their breasts bare in front of men of higher castes. It claims that this cloth used to cover the upper body was a sign of status and not a gendered practice. Men (and women) of a lower caste, would also have to take of their upper cloth when in the presence of a woman (or man) of a higher caste. The authors point throughout the article is that the right lens through which the significance of the "cloth" is to be viewed is in terms of caste and status; not that of gender. Don't know enough about the details here to compare the references he used against yours but thought it'd be helpful to share what comes after those first few lines.
What you say is true but don't let the article divorce the sexual connotations from this practice so easily just because the article begs you to. It is centuries old dirty laundry coming to light so the article is an eyewash.
Which is easier to say, "let your women be bare in front of us men" or to say, "let all of you bare yourselves before a higher person."
I'm an Indian I understand that the "higher" castes are less in number than the "lower ones" so lots of social and cultural stratagem are used to maintain the hierarchy
I do think the sexual connotations that come with exposing a woman's bare chest do arise from cultures and societies where that isn't as common. Most cultures present in hot/humid weather across the world do have at least some history of natural toplessness. Even in parts of northern India till the Muslim Conquest this wasn't uncommon. References to this cultural norm can be found in neighbouring states of Kerala alongside most places with similar weather like Thailand, Indonesia and tribes across Africa. The common thread between these cultures as well is that there's "outsiders" coming in with their own "male gaze" and norms change accordingly. A culture where it's normal for men to bare their chests doesn't remove any sexuality of a bare male chest while it also being normal enough to see in passing. Don't see why it's not natural for the same to apply to women when we remove ourselves and our "modern" sensibilities. The author does mention how women refused to cover up claiming "they weren't prostitutes and had nothing to hide". The standards for what's proper and what's scandalous change with time and imposing our westernized views on a culture with its own norms, taboos and social grammer isn't helpful imo. The discussion isolating Kerala here just does seem to come down to how late this practice seems to have gone on for and therefore how well documented it and the transition from it is. Not denying the role that caste played here obviously but do think I agree with the perspective here that this applied for men and women across the board and was not an attempt by the higher caste men to sneakily sexually subjugate lower caste women. Pictures and paintings of Nair princesses and queens (a famously matrilineal society) just do not make sense when looking at it from our cultural lens. I'm a keralite myself who's not very well versed in history other than the occasional article here and there so take that as you will to judge my biases and credibility (can confirm the weather really is disgustingly hot and maybe that's why I can see why it'd be more natural to have women and men bare their chest than have the multiple layers that come with something like a sari).
I am a keralite and when I was growing up it was common to see old topless women. I don’t think the caste actually determined who could be topless or not. Mind you this was 1990s. This custom stopped altogether as that generation of old women passed away. Now you won’t find women swimming around in the public ponds or being topless.
Also I think it’s extremely liberating that women could be topless without being subjected to lecherous gestures or stares which is the case now.
The trees are not unusual at all for the people living in tropical climates. Fun trees Yes but unusual no. Most people of the world live in tropical climates so for most these are not unusual
Pushing back against the subtle suggestion that only American and European viewpoints are normal is more an example of cleaning up shit than shitting on anybody.
Zen Z doesn't types to store knowledge. They would rather record the lecture or the meeting. I put aside my fone and put it on record while I am carefully listening to the meeting. I'm not even zen z. I would rather write than type
> Zen Z doesn't types to store knowledge. They would rather record the lecture or the meeting. I put aside my fone and put it on record while I am carefully listening to the meeting. I'm not even zen z. I would rather write than type
Recordings are one of the worse ways to store knowledge for later reference, except in usual scenarios. They're very awkward to work with. The only plus is their cheap an easy to make.
Trust me, I work at a company where "documentation" is often an old meeting recording (and sometimes you have to count yourself lucky to even have that).
Previously I would have agreed with you but as of the past year or so that's out of date thanks to automatic device local transcriptions becoming good enough.
reply