> Some people think that the present crisis was inevitable because of the flaws inherent in the Zionist program from the start.
Those people are correct. Kahane was right: a democractic Jewish state on territory inhabited mostly by non-Jews is an impossibility. Pick at most 2, but you cannot have all 3. If you wish to keep the Jewishness of the state (i.e. Zionism), you must either abandon democracy, change the population of the territory (ethnic cleansing/genocide), or both.
There are plenty of Israelis like the author—who are genuinely good people, who have no other land, and who love their country because any good person should strive to do so. Their attitude is understandable. They deserve a better country to love, one not built on Zionism.
Republican elected officials and members of the present admin, e.g. Tulsi Gabbard, were targeted by the program under Biden. So they had a personal grudge
You have it exactly backwards. Musk has been one of the major forces in the administration fighting to preserve and fix NASA. It’s his opponents within the Trump admin who want to cut it, and who convinced Trump to scuttle Isaacman’s nomination.
As the article said, nasa accounts for less than 7% of spacex revenue, additional nasa contracts is inconsequential to spacex which relies mostly on starlink for revenue
All russian strategic bombers are obsolete. However even old soviet bomber with old soviet missile can deliver 500kg of explosives far away targeting random civilian locations.
That was true before this memorandum, if I remember correctly and also at least if I'm reading the 2013 and 2022 memorandi correctly. The 12 month embargo was also scheduled to be eliminated at the end of this year, JB is just moving it up 6 months.
reply