Scroll down a page or so, the article is there. It's identical to just going to CNN's article, not sure why it's needed though.

Because NOT enriching uranium worked so badly for Gaddafi.

All it takes is one ultra-rich individual to say, "I'm having my bots build a bot-building factory and giving them to everyone who wants a bot. For free (after all, bots are doing all the work!) Or a hundred bots, who cares. They're free, bots are doing all the work anyway."

> If the average person does not know what an autopilot does

The average person does know what an autopilot does, they're just wrong.

I think the example you provided supports that.

A billion years of kludges.

> I don’t understand what the current crop of political leaders >thinks<

There's your problem.

One could say even that they are trying to hasten the fall of one empire to avoid a protracted period of wars for dominance before the next one rises.

For news about things that are going right, I suggest https://fixthenews.com/. You can get a free weekly email about progress in energy and the environment, national economies, health and medicine, crime etc (or pay for a longer weekly email).

If they have a family.

So: half (1+5) of them made it at least 50 days without cancer, and the other half made it at least 50 days with a smaller tumor? This sounds excellent to me. I agree that the sentence you quoted is overselling, though.

Humans aren't 100% perfect drivers. The question is not, "When will FSD reach 100%," it's "When (if ever) will FSD be better than humans."

And apparently that is perpetually five years from now.