Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Heck, I'd even have my developers write an AI that automatically extracts fair-use-length clips from videos and songs belonging to some of the biggest complainers, and uploads them as "honeypot" videos. If they complain about one of those, ban 'em from complaining again. They don't understand copyright law.


A 10 second clip of a movie isn’t necessarily fair use; It’s decided on a case by case basis. You can use as much as you need to get your point across; No more. If that’s 10 seconds, you can use 10 seconds. If that’s a minute, you can use a minute.


But if Google's lawyers took a stance on this, they could use precedent to set defined rules for what actually counts as fair use and all these claimants would be fucked.


Or they could lose. Courts don’t like it when someone games fair use.


Google doesn't get to decide what counts as fair use.


Right, but the contentID system essentially _is_ them deciding what fair use is.


Content ID seems more like forced arbitrage clauses - essentially a way to preempt and prevent people from using the legal system.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: